Identity and Deafness:Who Am I ? To Be Visual or Not to Be Visual? The Hard of Hearing Child An Australian CODA's Perspective

 
 

It Takes a Village to Raise a Deaf Child
By Roger Carver
Contributed to DWW by Roger Carver
Eye to Eye series, September/October 1997 issue of DCS newsletter
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

A couple of years ago, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the wife of U.S. President, Bill Clinton, published a book, titled, It Takes a Village. She was addressing the concerns over how American children and youth were being raised and calling for the need for greater community involvement in their upbringing. She evoked memories of an earlier era of smaller communities whose inhabitants looked after each other and worked together for their children's collective welfare.

It was a concept that was enthusiastically embraced by the American Society for Deaf Children which advocated greater community involvement for their deaf children. They knew that professionals could not or should not take on the primary role for the development of young deaf children's overall development. This was a concept which showed full fruit at last summer's Learning Vacation Experience (LVE) which was sponsored by the Deaf Children's Society. It was there that parents realized its true value.

At the LVE, with its high number of Deaf adults who served as staff members, parents were able to see how well they related to their children, both deaf and hearing alike. There were also Hearing staff members who were highly fluent in ASL. A number of young deaf children received their "kick-start" in language and communication as a result of being exposed to these adults, and their hearing siblings realized that their deaf siblings can grow up into normal and healthy persons. Parents were also able to interact and talk with these persons and learn everything from the proper perspective. This LVE also was the scene of a water fight between the parents and the staff members which considerably broke the ice between groups and among the parents themselves. They found that they were able to laugh, to relax and to have fun! Hearing parents were able to dish it out as well as take it from the Deaf adults; they were able to douse them with a water hose, dump water buckets on them and hurl water balloons at them without feeling guilty about "offending the sensibilities" of Deaf persons. This experience brought these families closer together. That is how it should be.

What is, then a Village? How should it be set up? As the Deaf are small in numbers and scattered throughout an entire region, it is not possible to have a village in the traditional, geographical sense. What we are talking about is a Global Village interconnected through certain organizations, events, and technology. The Deaf community truly functions as a global village, not only across regions, but nationally and internationally, and parents of deaf children are beginning to recognize its value as a priceless resource for themselves.

One family who is raising a deaf child in a small community in a part of B.C. that does not have ready access to services like that provided by the Deaf Children's Society is a part of our outreach program which emphasizes self-reliance and strong networking with other families and Deaf persons. They have done an outstanding job in raising this young deaf child, in becoming fluent in ASL, and in getting her to develop language in the absence of extensive professional intervention. She commented to us late last summer: "It is so simple, it makes me sick!" She touched upon a truth: parents with the right attitude, equipped with the right tools and supported by the right people, can do the job well without ever requiring clinical services. This family even actively encourages Deaf persons to stop by at their home to visit.

That is how it should be; for too many years countless thousands of Deaf persons have been disabled by professional intervention. Well-meaning but uninformed professionals prescribed to their families how they should raise and train their deaf children, often getting involved themselves and controlling the agenda. This approach has not worked well and never will - it only exacerbated the situation. There was a German movie, Beyond Silence, which recently screened at the Vancouver International Film Festival. Its plot centred around the relationships between a Deaf father, his hearing sister and his hearing daughter. It raised two issues which are relevant to this discussion about professional intervention. There was a scene around the family Christmas dinner table, in which the hearing members were having a conversation without including the Deaf man and his Deaf wife who were signing by themselves with their daughter. The Deaf man This discussion simply points out the fact that in most cases young deaf children are not "disabled" in the true sense of the word and that, if raised as nature intended and treated as a child first, he/she will turn out into a healthy, well-rounded individual. Proof is in the pudding: deaf children of Deaf parents seldom require intervention and they do generally better than deaf children of hearing parents. All the hearing parents need to do is to take a leaf from this book, and the best way they can accomplish this is by becoming fluent in sign language, participating in a Village of Deaf adults, families with deaf children, and extended family members, and enjoying seeing their children thrive in a natural social environment. They have done it with a good deal of success in Sweden and Denmark, and they can do it here.

Barbara Raimondo, the current president of the American Society for Deaf Children, puts it very well: "You hear so much about deaf children of Deaf parents and how much better they are doing than deaf children of hearing parents, it's easy to become discouraged. Hearing parents also need other hearing parents who have learned Sign Language and are managing successfully, as proof that it can be done, as role models, and to learn from."

Community self-help: That is all it takes.